top of page

The Marriage Bill's In-congruence with Present Day India

Updated: Aug 19, 2022

Written By: Vidyarth Tiwari

At what age should people marry? This, without a doubt, is a complicated

inquiry. Its conceivable response has in the past been endeavored by experts

in different fields, including human science, religion, selective breeding, demography, physiology, and statute. The inquiry has, for quite a while past, been getting the consideration of specialists in these disciplines in different pieces of the contemporary world. Endeavors to answer it have not exclusively been made by various nations at the public level, it has now become a worldwide issue.

The general elections of 2014 served as one of the greatest changes in the

history of Modern India due to its special socio-cultural effect. The

election was won by BJP and its alliances, with BJP coming out on top as the

biggest party. The party, heavily right-leaning, soon adopted a

conservative approach. The party has actualized a nationalist administration,

based more on religion than on the lines of ‘national interest’. This particular

government has had its fair share of controversial and somewhat blinkered

policies, be it the CAA or the recently withdrawn Farm Laws.

The Indian Government is now arranging to raise the lawful age of marriage to 21 from 18 for ladies. For men, it is as of now 21. A charge to formalize such a legal change was displayed within the Lok Sabha on December 21. Be that as it may, after resistance from the restriction parties, it was sent to a parliamentary board to assist with assessment. As per the charge, the modern least conjugal age for ladies might win over all the individual laws. In this manner, the legitimate age of marriage will be raised for all females in any

case of their religion. This bill not only goes against the principality of the Rule

of Law but is also meant to exploit its fellow citizens. It is thereby my objective

to establish why this bill is an effort to create disharmony in the country.

Firstly, I will address the bill, on general, moral, and philosophical grounds, and

then proceed to analyze the legislation on specific facts regarding law

comparing it to its counterpart laws in First World and Second World countries.

I will also address some of the more long-term effects it will have on the

nature of politics in the country,

First, let's look back at the past of this issue.

In 1978, the Indian government expanded the legitimate minimum conjugal

age for young ladies from 15 to 18 years, and for boys from 18 to 21 years.

The government contends that this will engage ladies and guarantee gender

equality. That might sound conceivable, to begin with, look, but seen against the background of expanding social and state control over marriage, the

proposed law may be aggravating. The marriage bill has been sent to a

parliamentary committee, but another disputable piece of enactment that

was passed makes changes to the law relating to decisions. It alters both The

Representation of the Individuals Acts of 1950 and 1951. Amusingly, within

the setting of characterizing everybody beneath 21 as a child within the

marriage law, the decision law correction fortifies the voting rights of 18-year

olds. “The Charge moreover increments the number of qualifying dates for the

amendment of discretionary rolls from one per year to four. At display,

January 1 of each year is the qualifying date. Each year, those turning 18 on or

sometime recently that day are qualified to be a voter. This has been revised to

incorporate April 1, July 1, and October 1 so that one requires not to hold up for

the conclusion of the year to apply for inclusion.”

The age of marriage was increased from 16 to 18 in 1978 in order to provide

better opportunities for women’s education and improve their health. However,

the latest National Family Health Survey (NFHS 5 2019–’21) has brought out the

dismal fact that 40 years later, we still have an alarming rate of child marriages

at 23%. This points to the failure on the part of the government to reach its

target of providing opportunities for girls in backward and poverty-stricken

areas or better access to healthcare. It has also not changed conservative and

anti-women attitudes towards women. So, what is the basis on which the

government claims that increasing the age of marriage from 18 to 21 will

empower women? On the contrary, it may, in fact, increase the number of

underage marriages exponentially and expose many more young adults to

criminal charges.

I could argue that an 18-year ancient individual can vote and is considered a

grown-up in other laws, but when it comes to marriage everybody is

considered a child until 21. Marriage is of course an instrument of social

control but is additionally a course of eluding from traditionalist shackles for

numerous women. A woman is viewed as a grown-up at 18 years old. All laws

that apply to grown-up residents, including criminal laws, will apply to a

woman at 18 years old. She is considered liable for the moves she makes.

Between the ages of 18-21, a lady is mature enough to be condemned to a

prison term in a grown-up jail, however as per the proposed Bill, she is too

youthful to even consider getting married. Moreover, the government has

been rigorously cutting down funding for public health and pushing the health

sector further toward privatization. Instead of increasing expenditure on the

health sector, it wants to curb the rights of adult women in the name of

health. This isn't women strengthening. This is women' infantilisation.

I for one accept that it is vital that young ladies are not driven into marriage

early; marriage ought not to be obligatory for them to acquire social and

financial status. However, an expansion in the base period of the union with 21years will be counterproductive. The last time of marriage doesn't mean obligatory age. It just connotes that beneath that age there could be criminal indictment under the child marriage law. Now, to build the time of union with 21 years would imply that young ladies will have nothing to do with their own issues until they are 21

Also, young ladies in India are prearranging a change, growing more office in

choices concerning their lives than prior. There is considerably more

addressing and even protection from the possibility of early marriage among

them, and occurrences of the resistance of young people against parental and

prevalent difficulties have stood out as truly newsworthy. This pushback from

young ladies is one reason why the meantime of marriage in India has

expanded to 22.1 years (MOSPI 2019). So why utilize corrective estimates

when the pattern of a later age for marriage is essentially improving and,

indeed, is willful?

The move is, in addition, not legitimized by proof. Eminently, the expressed

the reasoning for raising the time of marriage, which unexpectedly had stemmed

in 2020 from an evident worry for "the objectives of bringing down maternal

mortality, working on nourishing levels and related issues" has now been

changed as fundamental for "the strengthening of ladies". Obviously, the facts

confirm that those weddings at 21 years old and later are better, better fed,

better taught, and have preferable vocation openings over those

encountering kid marriage. Yet, would they say they are so advantaged on the

grounds that they postponed their relationships, or in light of the fact that

they come from good families, didn't need to cease their schooling rashly,

have no less than one better-taught parent, and don't come from socially

barred stations and clans? The proof proposes the latter

A few individuals inquire what is off-base with raising the age of marriage. But

what is the reality? When India has still a reasonably considerable number of

child marriages under the age of 18, the need ought to and must be to

address the causes. The National Family Wellbeing Overview tells us that

indeed in spite of the fact that the number of child relational unions

diminished from 27 percent to 23 percent within the final five a long time,

the diminish is more honed in urban ranges, whereas in rustic India, more

then every fourth lady within the age gather 20-24 was hitched sometime

recently she was 18. The reasons are well-known. The National Family Health

survey found that 23.3 percent of ladies in the age gathering of 20 to 24 years

were hitched before they turned 18. Around 6.8 percent of ladies in the age

gathering of 15-19 years were at that point moms or pregnant at the hour of

the overview. Only 41% of them have had more than ten years of tutoring as against 50.2 percent of men.

Indeed, even as far as financial strengthening, for example, possessing a cell

phone, only 54% of ladies own a cell phone that they use. The widespread

highlighted the coordinate joins between financial trouble and sad social

results in which children got to be the casualties. Amid the months of

lockdown from March to May final year, a child helpline bolstered by the

Service of Ladies and Child Improvement got over 5,200 calls of child

relational unions which they prevented.

While most minority networks have not gone against the raising of the age of

marriage, they bring up that individual laws have security under the

Constitution. As per the draft Bill, the proposed law will apply to all networks

and, once established, will supplant existing marriage and individual laws.

“We believe that the rule of law of the land must supersede Canon law… In

any case, within the Catholic as well as other communities, girls are getting

married later. But this is primarily in urban areas. The concern is the rural

areas, especially marginalized communities such as Scheduled Castes and

Scheduled Tribes,” he said. “The fear is that they will continue to get married

younger and hide it. It is also possible that the new law may be misused to

harass these communities and young people. These are concerns that the

Government must look into it before the Bill becomes law,’’ Father Savari Muthu,

spokesperson of Delhi Archdiocese, says.

One of the essential issues with the bill connects with the opportunity of

decision. Communist Party of India (Marxist) General Secretary and previous

Rajya Sabha part Sitaram Yechury has said that a lady at 18 years old is

lawfully a grown-up. As per him, with the end goal of marriage, regarding her

as an adolescent is self-problematic and the proposition disregards a grown-up's more right than wrong to settle on the private decisions of her accomplice.

The All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen party boss and Lok Sabha member

Asaduddin Owaisi had a comparable interpretation of the issue. The 205th Law Commission of India report submitted in February 2008 had assertively recommended a uniform age of marriage of 18 years, saying “there is no scientific reason why this should be different”. In August 2018 as well, the Law Commission had in a consultation

paper said that 18 years should be set as a uniform age for marriage. Therefore, while several commentators have lauded the latest move to bring uniformity in the age of marriage for men and women, they have questioned the need to increase the age for women to 21 years instead of fixing it at 18 years, as per the recommendations put forth over the years. In a nation where inter-caste and inter-religion can prompt deaths, such laws are frequently utilized by guardians against defiant children and little girls. This new period of marriage may project the net of culpability more extensive –

bringing more upset ladies and families into the descending twisting of cops

and courts. It is not yet clear, thusly, regardless of whether this new lawful time of

marriage for ladies achieves any of the aggressive changes it has decided to

accomplish, or whether 21 would wind up being simply one more number,

unequipped for settling the bunch that India has ended up in throughout

recent centuries the ground reality varies radically and law on its own will be ineffectual in changing the Indian worldview of child marriages.

In rustic India, it is frequently the situation that a female kid is considered to be a liability, and wedding them off is by all accounts a more prudent option. The mere presentation of this law won't change this reality. Therefore the legitimate change should be joined by a similar exertion towards changing the social scene of the country.

We will now have a look at the international perspective on marriage. In

1962 the United Nations adopted a convention recognizing the multifarious

importance of raising the age of marriage! The convention has since been

ratified by at least forty member states.

It was, of course, not a novel move in the history of the world body.

Its predecessor, the League of Nations, also not too long after its

emergence considered the question of child marriage and issued appeals

to the human fraternity to eradicate that evil. Long before the League of

Nations came into existence, and a movement for raising the age of marriage had,

in fact, been started in the East. As early as 1894 a modest beginning had in

this regard been already made in the erstwhile Indian state of Mysore. In 1917

the Ottoman empire had enacted a marriage law under which a considerably

high age of marriage was set for both genders. The attention of the two world

bodies to the issue of marriage age, however, led to its recognition elsewhere and earned it, gradually, global acceptance. Following the efforts made in this

respect by the League of Nations, the age of marriage was raised by law in British

India and Britain, both in 1929.5 Before the adoption of the 1962 Convention

by the United Nations, several other countries in both East and West-had

promulgated similar legislation. The two decades following the date of that

convention have witnessed on the globe a spate of marriage-age laws. Today,

in at least seventy countries legislation enforced by the state regulates the age

of marriage. In most states rules regarding marriage-age form part of the

family law which they have extensively reformed. Some of them have.

however, also enforced penal sanctions against early marriage.

Following this, we will take into account the marriage laws of Canada[a first

world country]

Starting around 2015, government law has set irrefutably the base eligible age

at 16. Provinces and regions might set a base age higher than that. In Canada

the time of a larger part is set by area/domain at 18 or 19, so minors under this

age have extra limitations (for example parental and court assent). Segment

293.2 of the Criminal Code additionally addresses relationships of people

younger than 16, perusing: Everyone who praises, helps, or partakes in a

marriage custom or service realizing that one of the people being hitched is

younger than 16 years is a legitimate fault for an indictable offense and

obligated to detainment for a term not surpassing five years. Section 2.2 of

the Civil Marriage Act likewise expresses: No individual who is younger than

16 years might contract marriage. These arrangements were established in

2015. Before 2015, it was workable for youngsters under 16 years of age to

get hitched in certain wards of Canada, with parental assent or court order.

(The lawful marriage age with parental assent was conceivably just about as

low as 7 in some Canadian jurisdictions.)

Now, we should have a look at the Russian laws regarding marriage.

The base eligible age in Russia is 18 years of age. In any case, in certain areas,

it isn't unexpected practice for adolescents to wed before the age of 18. Some

might even wed as youthful as 14 years old. For example, in Moscow, the

legitimate eligible age is 16 and in Bashkortostan, it is 14, with underage

relationships in Chechnya also. Lately, the possibility of kid marriage in Russia

has started lawful and social debates between different networks.

In 2015, Putin brought down the lawful period of union with 14 in

Bashkortostan. This dropped the time of assent for extraordinary conditions

like teenage pregnancy. In any case, the quantity of relationships is

purportedly ascending as teenager pregnancies are expanding. In addition,

general society has consented to the bringing down of the period of assent. This raises the issue that bringing down the age takes advantage of kids. The

issue stretches out in areas across Russia that are predominately

conservative in their perspectives and don't have close observation like in the

northern and southern Caucasus districts.

As we saw, the legal age to marry in the first world and second world countries is

comparatively way less than the new proposed age in India.

In fact, this has been the pattern around the world. As per a 2010 United

Nations (UN) Population Fund report, 18 years was the base legitimate time of

marriage without parental assent in 158 nations.

This, along these lines, raises the vital inquiry of lessening the base legitimate

time of marriage for men to 18 years. In any case, to more readily wrestle with

this issue, it is essential to comprehend the danger of youngster marriage in

India at a more profound level.

According to the UN Children's Fund, more than 1.5 million young ladies

younger than 18 get hitched in India. At a worldwide level, 33% of the

absolute are from India. As per 2019-21 NFHS information, 23% of relationships

in India are kid relationships. This is in the barefaced annulment of the law set up

at the present moment.

As indicated by research by Partners For Law in Development (PLD),

somewhere in the range between 2014 and 2016, a sum of 1,785 cases was

enrolled against child marriages. Nonetheless, just 274 were sentenced out

of which 65% were instances of elopement.

It is completely clear that the specialists have not been adequately careful to

manage the genuine issue of child marriages. There must be a finished

prohibition on underage relationships.

This issue is likewise far-reaching in numerous different countries. 2010

report by the UN Population Fund alluded to prior, gauges that in 146 nations,

State or standard laws permit young ladies more youthful than 18 to wed with

the assent of their folks.

In the new past, numerous countries have made moderate strides towards

this issue. For instance, in 2018, Norway's Parliament pronounced a sweeping

prohibition on relationships younger than 18. Comparable advances were

taken in Tanzania by its Supreme Court in 2019 and through the foundation

of a National Marriage Age Maturity Movement by the public authority in

Indonesia last year. The choice of the public authority in India to raise the base period of marriage for ladies to 21 years should have been visible as an ever-evolving step to

handle this issue. Nonetheless, except if this choice is went with the

illegalization of child marriages, it won't be effective in acquiring any critical

decrease in child marriages.


bottom of page